1 00:00:05,110 --> 00:00:02,869 significance so to wrap up very quickly 2 00:00:07,590 --> 00:00:05,120 health effects of ip may be effective in 3 00:00:09,750 --> 00:00:07,600 species other than humans the findings 4 00:00:12,230 --> 00:00:09,760 suggest that ip induced health 5 00:00:14,310 --> 00:00:12,240 benefits may actually be independent of 6 00:00:16,470 --> 00:00:14,320 any psychological cognitive or social 7 00:00:18,790 --> 00:00:16,480 factors of the prayer recipients 8 00:00:20,310 --> 00:00:18,800 and though the study provides no insight 9 00:00:22,310 --> 00:00:20,320 into whether intercessory prayers 10 00:00:24,950 --> 00:00:22,320 influence occurs via naturalistic or 11 00:00:27,589 --> 00:00:24,960 supernatural pathways the results 12 00:00:30,950 --> 00:00:27,599 suggest that ip works ultimately through 13 00:00:32,630 --> 00:00:30,960 naturalistic pathways in order to affect 14 00:00:59,750 --> 00:00:32,640 improvement 15 00:01:04,390 --> 00:01:02,069 oh the causes it would be all over 16 00:01:06,469 --> 00:01:04,400 grooming in these animals 17 00:01:17,109 --> 00:01:06,479 so that the cause was just spending 18 00:01:21,510 --> 00:01:19,429 it was four weeks and it was coincident 19 00:01:25,030 --> 00:01:21,520 with tr they received tryptophan for 20 00:01:27,670 --> 00:01:25,040 four weeks prayer for four weeks start 21 00:01:30,070 --> 00:01:27,680 yes started and stopped on the same day 22 00:01:32,550 --> 00:01:30,080 i think this gentleman john uh one of 23 00:01:34,710 --> 00:01:32,560 the criticisms of the step analysis was 24 00:01:36,710 --> 00:01:34,720 that the prayers that were given were 25 00:01:39,190 --> 00:01:36,720 written on a piece of paper and it was 26 00:01:40,550 --> 00:01:39,200 not naturally the way people pray 27 00:01:41,749 --> 00:01:40,560 did you 28 00:01:45,030 --> 00:01:41,759 have anything 29 00:01:47,590 --> 00:01:45,040 about that criticism to 30 00:01:50,069 --> 00:01:47,600 make it make your study better 31 00:01:52,469 --> 00:01:50,079 well i'm this is my own 32 00:01:54,469 --> 00:01:52,479 bias i think that people who are engaged 33 00:01:57,270 --> 00:01:54,479 in prayer practice 34 00:01:59,190 --> 00:01:57,280 find their own way to be able to pray so 35 00:02:00,870 --> 00:01:59,200 i offered direction if i'm answering 36 00:02:02,789 --> 00:02:00,880 your question correctly but didn't 37 00:02:05,109 --> 00:02:02,799 monitor i left the intercessors to their 38 00:02:06,630 --> 00:02:05,119 own devices because these were seasoned 39 00:02:08,469 --> 00:02:06,640 these were prayer warriors we could 40 00:02:09,990 --> 00:02:08,479 think of these were seasoned individuals 41 00:02:17,270 --> 00:02:10,000 and so i trusted them to their own 42 00:02:23,110 --> 00:02:18,470 all of them 43 00:02:25,430 --> 00:02:23,120 so they all were suffering from 44 00:02:31,589 --> 00:02:25,440 self-injurious behavior that's why we 45 00:02:35,350 --> 00:02:33,670 yes but all of these belong to that 46 00:02:37,750 --> 00:02:35,360 subgroup of captive primates because it 47 00:02:39,430 --> 00:02:37,760 was a much larger lab and not all the 48 00:02:48,710 --> 00:02:39,440 animals were affected 49 00:02:53,030 --> 00:02:51,190 that is a wonderful question and part of 50 00:02:54,949 --> 00:02:53,040 it and this is again is my own bias you 51 00:02:57,110 --> 00:02:54,959 know as scientists we sort of speculate 52 00:02:59,110 --> 00:02:57,120 on part of what may be going on i wanted 53 00:02:59,910 --> 00:02:59,120 to go into this with the strongest iv i 54 00:03:02,309 --> 00:02:59,920 could 55 00:03:04,550 --> 00:03:02,319 and i wonder about a dose response 56 00:03:06,869 --> 00:03:04,560 effect although i believe that one good 57 00:03:08,949 --> 00:03:06,879 prayer can affect change that's why i 58 00:03:10,790 --> 00:03:08,959 wanted a number of intercessors i had 59 00:03:12,550 --> 00:03:10,800 one group of intercessors that 60 00:03:15,190 --> 00:03:12,560 structured their intercession so they're 61 00:03:17,430 --> 00:03:15,200 praying 24 7. literally around the clock 62 00:03:19,430 --> 00:03:17,440 so these animals were immersed in prayer 63 00:03:21,270 --> 00:03:19,440 throughout the 28 days that's a great 64 00:03:23,030 --> 00:03:21,280 question but nobody to my knowledge has 65 00:03:24,949 --> 00:03:23,040 asked that 66 00:03:26,790 --> 00:03:24,959 i didn't get the question 67 00:03:30,550 --> 00:03:26,800 oh it was about 68 00:03:33,990 --> 00:03:30,560 numbers of intercessors and yes 69 00:03:38,309 --> 00:03:36,470 no some animals would actually have two 70 00:03:39,830 --> 00:03:38,319 that was one of the considerations for 71 00:03:42,630 --> 00:03:39,840 what may have moved them into the more 72 00:03:44,309 --> 00:03:42,640 severe category and so we measured each 73 00:03:46,550 --> 00:03:44,319 individual wound if there was more than 74 00:03:50,149 --> 00:03:46,560 one wound then we total the wound area 75 00:03:54,869 --> 00:03:52,309 very very complete study but i wondered 76 00:03:56,710 --> 00:03:54,879 why you didn't create wounds so you 77 00:03:59,030 --> 00:03:56,720 could have identical wounds and not have 78 00:04:01,190 --> 00:03:59,040 this that really would run against not 79 00:04:03,910 --> 00:04:01,200 only my own ethical although i had 80 00:04:05,750 --> 00:04:03,920 originally thought about some infectious 81 00:04:08,070 --> 00:04:05,760 uh process 82 00:04:09,350 --> 00:04:08,080 but trying to recruit intercessors to 83 00:04:10,949 --> 00:04:09,360 pray 84 00:04:13,910 --> 00:04:10,959 there really are certain parameters and 85 00:04:16,150 --> 00:04:13,920 if the wounds were inflicted i would not 86 00:04:17,749 --> 00:04:16,160 have gotten intercessors to pray people 87 00:04:19,509 --> 00:04:17,759 came on board because they saw this was 88 00:04:21,590 --> 00:04:19,519 a legitimate condition we were treating 89 00:04:24,150 --> 00:04:21,600 all the animals and so they agreed to 90 00:04:27,110 --> 00:04:24,160 participate 91 00:04:27,120 --> 00:04:27,990 and it sounds to magnitude 92 00:04:32,070 --> 00:04:29,749 like the procedures that you've been 93 00:04:33,270 --> 00:04:32,080 using you said 24 7. so you've 94 00:04:34,790 --> 00:04:33,280 structured something from if i 95 00:04:36,390 --> 00:04:34,800 understand correctly 96 00:04:38,790 --> 00:04:36,400 from a dose point of view at least in 97 00:04:40,950 --> 00:04:38,800 terms of continuity of time it's not 15 98 00:04:42,469 --> 00:04:40,960 minutes per day right 99 00:04:44,629 --> 00:04:42,479 are there any other factors that you 100 00:04:46,950 --> 00:04:44,639 think might help explain why 101 00:04:49,110 --> 00:04:46,960 the magnitude of effects appear to be 102 00:04:51,510 --> 00:04:49,120 larger in your particular study 103 00:04:54,150 --> 00:04:51,520 um i think in part because my own take 104 00:04:55,830 --> 00:04:54,160 and i actually work with humans as a 105 00:04:59,430 --> 00:04:55,840 clinical health psychologist i'm not a 106 00:05:01,909 --> 00:04:59,440 primatologist and i suspect in my gut 107 00:05:03,670 --> 00:05:01,919 that the fact that we are human and our 108 00:05:05,749 --> 00:05:03,680 psychologic and cognitive factors 109 00:05:08,550 --> 00:05:05,759 actually impede our ability to take 110 00:05:11,110 --> 00:05:08,560 advantage of whatever this ambient 111 00:05:13,830 --> 00:05:11,120 goody may be out there and the animals 112 00:05:15,990 --> 00:05:13,840 don't they're just 113 00:05:17,590 --> 00:05:16,000 so that that's part of what i suspect so 114 00:05:19,350 --> 00:05:17,600 i think it's it's practice effects and 115 00:05:21,110 --> 00:05:19,360 the part of the intercessors dose may 116 00:05:23,670 --> 00:05:21,120 play a play a role 117 00:05:26,390 --> 00:05:23,680 um and the fact that they're not impeded